Roswell

Picture this: a flickering black-and-white film, the kind that makes you squint to figure out what’s going on. Through the murkiness, there’s this odd, puffed-up figure—six fingers, a swollen head, looking like something that doesn’t belong on this planet. Then a pathologist’s scalpel slices into its strange skin. The scene is tumultuous and unsettling, leaving you to ponder: could this be the definitive evidence of an extraterrestrial crash landing in Roswell decades ago?

Let’s rewind to July 7, 1947. Out on the Foster ranch, just beyond the dusty edges of Roswell, New Mexico, something weird turned up—wreckage of some unidentifiable craft and, stranger still, bodies that didn’t look human. The very next day, a press officer from the Roswell Army Air Field eagerly shared the news with the local newspaper, the Roswell Daily Record. He boasted that the 509th Bomb Group, a top-notch Air Force unit, had nabbed a genuine alien ship. But the excitement didn’t last long. General Roger Ramey, the leader of the US 8th Air Force, intervened almost immediately to shut it down. Nope, he said, it was just an experimental balloon. That became the official narrative, and for years, the government consistently denied the existence of any flying saucer rumours.

At first, folks bought the balloon explanation. But that Roswell spark lit a fire—UFO sightings started cropping up all over, especially near hush-hush Air Force bases like Area 51 in Nevada. The government consistently denied the existence of Area 51, escalating people’s suspicions. Conspiracy theories started swirling, and the Roswell Incident never really faded from the spotlight. In 1994, a congressman from New Mexico took action. He advocated for an investigation, prompting the General Accounting Office—those tasked with delving into government mysteries—to begin their work. The General Accounting Office discovered a chaotic situation, with crucial Air Force records either missing or destroyed. Still, they neatly wrapped it up, claiming that it was a weather balloon after all, and those “bodies” were just test dummies made to look human. They were simply test dummies that were designed to resemble humans. There is nothing to see here, folks.

Suddenly, Roswell resurfaced on television screens across the globe. It started in 1992, when Ray Santilli, a British media guy, rolled into Cleveland, Ohio, chasing some old Elvis footage from a retired cameraman. The guy casually mentioned he had something else—film from an alien autopsy, shot back when he was in the military. Santilli snapped it up in November 1994 and planned a big reveal at the British UFO Research Association’s conference the next August. Word leaked early, though, and by March 1995, the buzz was too big to ignore. So, on May 5, he premiered it for a select crowd at the Museum of London. By the end of that summer, millions had seen this supposed glimpse of an alien laid bare on a slab.

The evidence was astounding, yet the doubters spared no effort. What was the clear-cut theory? It was a Hollywood fake, cooked up with movie magic. Experts who know special effects say it’s a sham—but a darn good one. Despite the close-knit nature of the film industry, no one has ever pinpointed the individual responsible for this feat. Meanwhile, some biologists aren’t so sure it’s all artificial. They wonder if it could be a human body, tweaked to look alien. The questions just keep piling up. Who filmed it? No one knows—the cameraman’s identity is a ghost, despite a weird follow-up video where someone claiming to be him rambled about his role. Santilli’s got more footage, he says, but he’s never let anyone really study it. The shocking revelation is that the aliens depicted in his film do not align with the descriptions provided by witnesses from the crash site in New Mexico.

Pretty much every expert who’s seen it calls it a hoax. Santilli, though? He has made significant money and continues to maintain his belief in its authenticity. For the rest of us, it’s a maddening puzzle. We’re wired to doubt the government’s stonewalling, but the alternatives—like Santilli’s shaky story—are so flimsy it’s tough to know what’s what. Maybe the truth’s out there, buried in the desert or locked away in some vault. Or maybe it’s just a mirage, and we’ll never get a clear shot at it.